Maîtriser l’Art de Résumer : Utiliser Chat GPT pour Éclairer les Articles Académiques

What if it detect plagiarism?

You asked for a 500 word summary. Did you count the words? My experience is that ChatGPT is not good at counting… Maybe I am doing something wrong

Thank you for sharing this and I appreciate your exploration of ChatGPT as a tool — and agree that we should keep exploring this as educators. However, even in what is generated it seems that there are some of the problems with ChatGPT in that it does not always provide factual information. In the past, I've uploaded documents that I have read and there are factual errors in the ChatGPT summaries (it was an overview of work on socio-spatial analysis — qualitative work). Checking some of what you've uploaded there are some things that are not exactly correct in the output as well. For example, the first article is by Strathdee, Crago, and Shannon, yet by the time you get to 16.53 min in the video, the "first article" is by Milloy et al. and so is the "second article." Also even while Milloy is the actual fourth author in the second article you originally summarized, one wouldn't use "Milloy et al." when citing it, i.e., I would point out to a student that this is technically incorrect. These are minor-ish errors in terms of the names of authors, but it brings up how ChatGPT is difficult to trust. I'm sure if one was to read the articles you had ChatGPT summarize and compare that to the the AI output that they would find, perhaps, even more important discrepancies. In addition, at the 17 min mark, we can also see that neither of the two original titles are correct at this point, but some other titles have been used. When I then look up the titles for two articles ChatGPT mentions, I don't find either cited in your original two articles nor can I find them in a broader search in Google Scholar. I agree with much of your use for brainstorming here, but there are so many red flags in terms of actual and potential factual errors in the output.

thank you very much for the sharing. But i have a question for you? how can we use this for journals that is very long? Can you help me in this? tq

Could you have used the url of the Google Scholar article instead?

Thanks a lot for this video! Just a question- what do we do when it says ‘ too many requests in one hour, try again later.’ This happened the first time i tried using it. Is there a limit for how many times we can use it or something like that?

Thanks for your video it is s nice tool. And thanks for sharing your prompts

I recently used chatGPT to perform a similar function; I wanted to have a peer reviewed publication summarized in 500 words. I did not use the cut and paste function, because I was told that because of the word limit, the response that I would receive would be shorter. Instead, I posted a link to that article in chatGPT, and it provided an excellent summary of the same article without cut/paste.

Can we ask chat gpt to write literature review for our dissertation with no issues of plagiarism?

Thanks a lot. Could you share the prompts you used please?

Thanks for the demonstration.

Valuable channel, deserves more subscribers. Best of luck 🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🤗