L’Affrontement des Titans de l’IA : ChatGPT Plus face à Gemini Advanced !

Read more on CNET.com: ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini: Which Chatbot Wins? https://cnet.us/auq

love the shape of your head , no offence , no mocking , just pure head architectural masterpiece voluptuous head shape

MEGAMIND

I have been a plus user of OpenAI since almost day one but I decided to use Google Gemini Advance for 1 month and I can't wait to go back to CHATGPT. First of all it still can't analyze photos with people because Google has blocked that, also it is not as intelligent as CHATGPT. You will notice this yourself if you use it intensively, that Gemini does not follow the prompts. The only plus I find is the deep (re)search. Clearly a NO, Gemini is not worth the money.

Will no doubt upgrade to premium 10 tb once gemini catches up. Im rooting for it to catch up but it just sucks compared to chatgpt. Will be paying the same for premium anyway.

are you mad trying chatgpt 4o that is lowest version of chatgpt and also free with gemini powerfull and paid version try chatgpt o1 fake video creator

as a mortgage broker and business owner, what do you guys recommend for me, gemeni , co pilot or chatgpt , i will do the paid version of course, I want something that will remember past conversations ? i keep hearing different things

This is amazing. Imagine where this technology will be in another 5 years!

Might as well compare the two products by asking for jokes.

ChatGPT 4 0 pro is useless to write a novel. It cannot remember commands over multiple sessions. It creates files with characters that make it impossible to convert to PDF or DOCX files. It forgets things randomly and it says you have to reload your entire work every single session. It nows how to set up a file system but doesn't do it even when commanded to. For instance, it shows only part of a chapter when I ask it to show a chapter. It will create all new chapters when as to show what you have already written. The Plus version has severe limitations like a document length limit of 30,000 words and an input limit of only a few hundred words. I used it for a week and cancelled.

Gemini its real trash compared to chat gpt. Easy.

Gemini is complete trash. ChatGPT is far superior.

I was using chat GPT app since multiple months previously untill i tried Meta AI on insta…. It was same or in some cases it gave me better and more accurate answers and allowed me to interupt and it usually gave me analysis with updated info when ChatGPT failed to do that and I did not need to get any extra app to use that AI unlike ChatGPT or Gemini.. and Meta AI also gave me some some analysis on many things which Chat GPT straight up denied or just cant understand what i want…. So, since then, i have been using Meta AI on Whatsapp & insta and deleted ChatGPT app…

Note: I tested premium version of chat GPT4o.. which is fair bcz Meta AI is also free..

Gemini is religious😂😂😂

That was the most pointless test I've ever seen.

👍🏼

ChatGPT vs. Gemini: Why Google's AI Strategy is Failing to Keep Up with OpenAI

In the ongoing AI showdown, Microsoft-backed ChatGPT has taken a clear lead over Google’s Gemini, and the reasons lie in Google’s series of strategic missteps. Here’s how Google’s decisions are putting them at a disadvantage—and why these issues might not be easily reversible.

1. Missing the Initial AI Wave: Google held off for too long, underestimating the rapid development of AI and allowing OpenAI to take the spotlight. By the time Google saw the potential, Microsoft had already invested in OpenAI, giving them first-mover advantage. Google’s late entry meant they had to play catch-up, while OpenAI was solidifying its market position and gaining public trust.

2. Choosing Competition Over Cooperation: Unlike Microsoft, which strategically partnered with OpenAI, Google opted to go it alone and compete directly. Microsoft’s move gave it access to state-of-the-art AI models without the need to reinvent the wheel, letting them integrate ChatGPT into Azure, Bing, and Office 365. Meanwhile, Google was left to develop a proprietary model, Gemini, which brought with it added costs and pressure to deliver.

3. The MoE (Mixture of Experts) Model Gamble: Gemini’s foundation on the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture has introduced its own set of problems. MoE, while theoretically designed for scaling efficiency, splits tasks among “experts” within the model, which can lead to fragmented responses and lower coherence. This setup often struggles to deliver the natural, cohesive interactions that users expect, especially when compared to ChatGPT’s monolithic, unified structure. Each added “expert” in Gemini’s MoE increases the risk of conflicting outputs, amplifying inconsistency—exactly what you don’t want in a conversational AI.

Results and Market Impact: Microsoft’s clear strategy has paid off massively, with its market cap hitting record highs due to AI-driven enthusiasm and investor confidence. In contrast, Google has faced stock volatility and skepticism about Gemini’s quality. The issues around Gemini are becoming a public perception problem, even spawning online memes about its performance.

Is There a Path Back? In both business and chess, certain moves can’t be undone, and Google’s decisions are leaving scars. Transitioning away from MoE would require extensive re-engineering, adding further costs and delays. Meanwhile, Microsoft and OpenAI are building on their existing success, continually refining ChatGPT with iterative improvements. For Google, these compounding issues may mean that they’re stuck in a self-made trap.

In your view, can Google recover from these strategic blunders, or are we witnessing the start of a long-term shift in AI leadership?