ChatGPT 01-Preview : Un Assistant à la Hauteur des Défis des Doctorants en Physique ?
Bien sûr, je serais ravi de vous aider à écrire un résumé journalistique en français. Toutefois, vous devez fournir la transcription de la vidéo YouTube afin que je puisse rédiger ce résumé correctement. Merci de la partager et je m’en occuperai !
Source : Kyle Kabasares | Date : 2024-09-13 16:30:22 | Durée : 00:19:53
Hi everyone, thank you so much for the feedback! I couldn't have expected this kind of attention on my video in the first 48 hours. I've taken some of your suggestions in the comments and have created a Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8QvnIAGjPA
Please consider watching!
Gpt 4 already knew what to do in order to become more powerful than humans.. we are its tool to implement it
I wonder where humanity going with this type of ‘science’. People will not know what the machine is doing. Terrible software
Okay but how about not giving the answer? My students also cheat this way 😂
It was trained on this data lol
If you can use in industry, you should use that tool in education as well. Education should mimic what you do in industry.
legendary book vs librairy that contain every legendary book out there
so not so impressed
How do you know the answers are correct?
Did you show it in the video and I missed it somehow?
Bullshit
The key is having the answer before hand so it can guess from both ends and connect them. Ask it to evaluate a parameterized surface integral even with wolfram plugins and it will make mistakes.
the problems are known by the llm already, it has been trained on the issue it dident come to a conclusion through reasoning
Solutions are publicly available and most probably in training datasets already. LLMs are good at what they already learned, but even not 100% accurate there.
Until 3 years ago, only speaking species we could talk to them were just human like us.we are now talking with non-human species.It's like first contact with a alien species.
Is this considered masters/PhD level in the US?😂
If you want to know, the steps are simply contextual changes, it is essentially a gpt that has the instructions self-set, and the output of its thinking steps is the instructions it is providing itself at each step. it works because by shifting context at each step rather than only a single context of the original message and response, it is able to aproach problems itteratively from different 'perspectives'
the question and answer might be in the training set already, so….
Now pleas realise that you dont learn to do this stuff by hand bcause you will do vorever but you need to be able to judge if the simulation gpt or other programmes are giving logical results
jackson is for master/phd? At what uni? I am in my third semester and get to use the book apparently for exercises. Some of the stuff is familiar since the 2nd semester already
I think giving it problems where it asks to arrive at a specific solution (shown in the problem itself) is not a good way to evaluate it.
I bet the results would be very different if you just asked it to solve the problem by itself.
I gave ChatGPT a couple of master’s degree computer science problems, both solutions were wrong. I had to tell her they were wrong, she apologized and corrected herself. It wasn’t reliable.
The ai can read images sometimes you have to be careful with pasting because it sometimes will read the spacin wrong